Sam Vaknin’s Instagram Epigrams (archive only)
Narcissism with Vaknin on Instagram (active account)
Charles Bowes-Taylor (http://www.narcissism.co.za) and Sam Vaknin discuss narcissistic abuse from the narcissist's point of view.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Developed by Sam Vaknin, Cold Therapy is based on two premises: (1) That narcissistic disorders
are actually forms of complex post-traumatic conditions; and (2) That narcissists
are the outcomes of arrested development and attachment dysfunctions.
Consequently, Cold Therapy borrows techniques from child psychology and from
treatment modalities used to deal with PTSD.
Cold Therapy consists of the re-traumatization of
the narcissistic client in a hostile, non-holding environment which resembles
the ambience of the original trauma. The adult patient successfully tackles
this second round of hurt and thus resolves early childhood conflicts and
achieves closure rendering his now maladaptive narcissistic defenses redundant,
unnecessary, and obsolete.
Cold Therapy makes use of proprietary techniques
such as erasure (suppressing the client’s speech and free expression and
gaining clinical information and insights from his reactions to being so
stifled). Other techniques include: grandiosity reframing, guided imagery,
negative iteration, other-scoring, happiness map, mirroring, escalation, role
play, assimilative confabulation, hypervigilant referencing, and re-parenting.
It is proving to be an effective treatment for major depressive episodes (see
this article about the link between pathological narcissism and depression and
this article about depression and regulatory narcissistic supply in narcissism).
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Drag your narcissist to attend
therapy, of you must. But will it work or be of any
use?
Interview with News Intervention.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Codependency
is a form of displacement.
The codependent is no longer emotionally invested
(cathected) in her partner.
In fact, in many cases, she is averse to him and
can’t stand him.
But, she displaces her emotional investment
(cathexis) onto the shared fantasy of the relationship ("the dream of us
that we had together").
The codependent gives up on her partner but is
still strongly emotionally attached to the VISION that he had proposed and,
therefore can't let go, becoming unboundaried, dysregulated, stalkish,
dramatic, emotionally extortionate, and clinging within the rapidly
deteriorating relationship.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Anything that endows an individual with a
comparative advantage at performing a complex task constitutes intelligence. In this sense, viruses reify intelligence, they are
intelligent. Human intelligence, though, is versatile and the tasks are usually
far more complex than anything a virus might need to tackle.
Jacobsen: What defines IQ or Intelligence Quotient?
Vaknin:
The ability to perform a set of mostly – but not only
- analytical assignments corresponding to an age-appropriate average. So, if a
10 year old copes well with the tasks that are the bread and butter of an 18
years old, he scores 180 IQ.
IQ measures an exceedingly narrow set of skills
and mental functions. There are many types of intelligence – for example:
musical intelligence – not captured by any IQ test.
Jacobsen: What defines giftedness, to you? Even
though, formal definitions exist.[8]
Vaknin:
Giftedness resembles autism very much: it is the
ability to accomplish tasks inordinately well or fast by focusing on them to
the exclusion of all else and by mobilizing all the mental resources at the
disposal of the gifted person.
Obviously, people gravitate to what they do well.
Gifted people have certain propensities and talents to start with and these
probably reflect brain abnormalities of one kind or another.
Jacobsen: Inter-relating the previous three
questions, what separates intelligence from IQ from giftedness, i.e., separates
each from one another?
Vaknin:
IQ is a narrow measure of highly specific types of
intelligence and is not necessarily related to giftedness. Gifted people invest
themselves with a laser-focus to effect change in their environment conducive
to the speedy completion of highly specific tasks.
Jacobsen: What defines genius?
Vaknin:
Genius is the ability to discern two things: 1.
What is missing (lacunas) 2. Synoptic connections.
The genius surveys the world and completes it by
conjuring up novelty (i.e., by creating). S/he also spots hidden relatedness
between ostensibly disparate phenomena or data.
Read the rest of the interview on the News
Intervention website.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The narcissist induces in you a dream state by entraining you, takes over your unconscious, mirrors you
as loving mother would, inserts himself as introject in your mind.
The guy in the thumbnail is Jacques Lacan - not
Sam Vaknin.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
We try to make sense of the world and imbue it
with meaning by inventing narratives.
But then we get confused and we think that the
narratives are real.
All evil in the world is the outcome of this
confusion.
Animation by the inimitable Steve Cutts.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Motherhood is a JOB. Anyone - men, women, an AI robot - can be a
"good enough mother".
Mother’s main role is to frustrate the child and
push it away, allowing it to separate, individuate, and form proper reality
testing, get rid of magical thinking.
At the same time, the mother needs to be a
safe/secure base: empathic, attuned, caring, loving, accepting.
Prepare the child for physical reality, social
reality (socialization), hegemonic culture (acculturation), and skills
acquisition.
Sex is biologically determined, although about 2%
are born with an indeterminate sex.
Gender is different.
It is performative (Butler), the outcome of
socialization, dominance-submission, gendered personality (masculine/feminine),
and discrimination by women against boys.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Speaker in Psychiatry Forum 2022 in August, in Zagreb, Croatia.
Won the 2022 INSO International Research Award - Excellence Service Award for my work on personality disorders.
Won the 2022 INSO Outstanding
Scientist Award in Engineering, Science, and Medicine for my
work on personality disorders and on my Chronon Field Theory (in physics).
My lectures and presentations are also made
available on my YouTube channel. Watch the latest ones here.
Speaker in other international conferences on
psychology, psychiatry, mental health, and neuroscience:
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/mediakit.html
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Parentifying (better said: adultifying) is when a child is coerced by
caregivers into assuming adult, developmentally inappropriate roles as: a
surrogate parent to his siblings, a referee between his parents, or a caregiver
for a mentally or physically disabled parent.
The child emulates his parents and their mental
issues as it assumes parental roles.
Very often the parents of parentified children
are, in Andre Green’s term, “Dead Mothers”: absent, depressed, self-centred,
dysempathic, capricious, dangerous, instrumentalizing, or abusive.
The child is, therefore, forced to parent itself
by internalizing his parents’ disorders, dysfunctional attachment styles, and
trauma bonding. As adults, they regulate their sense of self-worth by caring
for others.
The parentified child grows up feeling responsible
for everyone around him. He is incapable of having fun, never have had a childhood.
Parentified children grow up to be control freaks, are self-reliant, trust no
one, and always get involved in conflicts as arbiters or peacemakers.
They feel the need to be “good, worthy,
trustworthy, and reliable” even at the expense of their own needs (they are
self-sacrificial). They always feel either that their efforts are not
appreciated – or that they should do more. Consequently, some of them end up
being passive-aggressive (negativistic) or even covert narcissists and
“empaths”.
Parentified children resemble Borderlines in that
they engage in compensatory behaviors that are not calibrated and
proportionate: reckless promiscuity and substance abuse, for examples. Some of
them end up being codependent, people-pleasers, and highly sensitive people
(HSPs).
Dialog
with the psychologist Daria Zukowska @zukowska.daria
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Richard Grannon (@richard.grannon) and Sam Vaknin (@narcissismwithvaknin ) event in Prague, on February 15, 2022.
Join us for free. RSVP assistant4film@gmail.com
(write to this email address to present questions and participate in the event).
Part of the forthcoming documentary on
narcissistic abuse (a phrase I coined in 1995) by Mark Vicente (@markvicente) and Scott Altomare (@saltosea).
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Infidelity
with a stranger in a drunken one night stand has a liberating
effect on some women. It can be therapeutic.
Cheating allows them to break free from abusive,
dead, and dysfunctional relationships.
The identity of the other man rarely matters, the
sex is often cursory and bad, and the whole dreary affair is meaningless and
emotionless. It is frequently a one-off.
But the very ability to obliterate this last
remaining boundary and the resolve to cross the exclusivity Rubicon empower the
woman and destroy any last vestige of attachment and bonding to her long lost
intimate partner.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Counterintuitively, aggressive or
passive-aggressive defiance is often mistaken for codependency.
The defiant mate has an avoidant-dismissive
attachment style.
When confronted with demands for intimacy and commitment,
he pushes his partner away and tolerates even her most egregious misbehaviors
(for example: ostentatious infidelity) as long as she lets him be. He just
wants her out of his hair.
This profound indifference to his partner’s
whereabouts and wrongdoing is often misinterpreted as abject codependency.
But it is actually a bid for agentic freedom and
self-efficacious autonomy.
The perfect partner for such a person is someone
who is transactional and equally averse to intimacy.
They both lead parallel lives, happily cocooned in
their private worlds, and engage in occasional sex or a shared fantasy (future
faking in the case of psychopaths) with each other and with extradyadic
partners. Such pseudo-relationships are very durable and can last a lifetime.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Cults have been with us since time immemorial. But, starting in
the 1960s, we had switched from “cults of worship” to “cults of mirroring”.
In cults of worship the cult leader is adulated
for qualities which render him or her unattainable and superhuman. S/he cannot
be emulated because s/he is sui generis. M
These cults are secular proto-religions with a
prophet or Messiah figure at the helm. Their texts are scriptures in all but
name.
In mirroring cults, the leader is a mere an energizing
and shrewd entrepreneur (at most, an accessible guru), “one of us”, fallibly
human, imperfect, and subject to successful imitation.
His or her teachings read like self-help books or
“how to” manuals. He has followers or fans rather than worshippers, believers,
and adherents.
The transition from one type of cults to the other
reflects the contumacious rejection of authority and the rise of malignant
egalitarianism.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
We construct or adopt narratives in order to make sense of ourselves, of others, and of the
world at large. Narratives can be rigid (ideological) or open-ended (mutable or
flexible).
Rigid narratives are ritualistic, prescriptive,
and proscriptive. They are immutable and often counterfactual. They constitute
a part of their adherents’s identity. Religion is a rigid narrative, for
example.
Healthy, normal people can hold several
compartmentalized narratives simultaneously and deploy them circumstantially
(narrative fluidity, effected via narrative switching).
They do not resist countervailing information (they have no
confirmation bias). They modify their narratives to respond adequately to their
environment (adaptive narratives).
When mental health issues are present, only one
narrative is active and it is always rendered rigid and constricting in order
to ameliorate anxiety (anxiolytic rigidification).
The onslaught of reality engenders in the
unhealthy a narrative failure and an existential crisis: a lack of meaning so
profound that it often results in suicidal ideation.
Instead of narrative fluidity, mental health
pathologies lead to a fragmentation of the self into self-states, each with its own single, rigid narrative.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Virtue
signalling is not limited to the woke left. Anti-vaxxers
virtue signal as do white supremacists and religious militants of all stripes.
Virtue signalling is a social bonding ritual with
like-minded people. It involves prescribed and proscribed actions and cohering
group entraining via repeated slogans and mantras.
Recent studies link virtue signalling to a
victimhood personality construct and dark triad propensities (especially
subclinical psychopathy and subclinical narcissism).
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ironically, the comorbidity of depression
with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
reduces the incidence of reckless acting out and improves impulse control.
Depressed Borderlines have been mistakenly dubbed
“introverts” or “shy, quiet borderlines”.
Outwardly, like every other dysphoric, anhedonic,
and dysthymic person, the depressed borderline is mostly homebound and listless.
But when the veil of depression lifts, her true
character emerges: she becomes gregarious, promiscuous, a novelty-seeker, and a
defiant risk-taker.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
It is crucial that you learn everything about
the personal
and sexual history of your intimate partner.
Absolutely insist on full disclosure.
Consider promiscuity, for example.
The following facts are not manosphere anecdotes.
They are the findings in multiple studies.
Sociosexually unrestricted folks (casual
sex practitioners) are 3-10 times more likely to divorce.
The reasons they give for settling down after a
spree of sex with multiple strangers are all wrong: they are “exhausted”,
interested in financial security or sharing the burden, and other self-centred
motivations.
Sociosexually unrestricted people are
subclinical psychopaths (dark personalities).
Promiscuous people perceive long-term committed
relationships as “giving up” on freedoms rather than as gaining from the
togetherness.
They trade sex for safety. As they age, they have
a much poorer body image, so they are looking to convert their fast dwindling
assets into durable, lifelong goods and services afforded by an intimate
partner.
Even so, promiscuous partners set an impossibly
high bar sexually and so are always disgruntled about the quality and/or
frequency of sex in the serious relationship.
While capable of commitment, they get bored of
their relationships much faster than their partners and they cheat way more
often than their non-promiscuous peers.
Their grievances legitimize their cheating
(usually in bouts of casual sex) in their minds.
Still think that you should not find out
everything you can about your partner’s sexual and relationship history?
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The narcissist is incapable of attachment, bonding, and
positive emotionality
He is possessive of his women only in two
situations:
GRANDIOSITY/UNIQUENESS
1. When he is acquiring a woman and she chooses
another man over him for sex only or for more, thus disrupting the process of
co-idealization;
UTILITARIAN/INSTRUMENTAL/TRANSACTIONAL
2. When in a shared fantasy and he risks losing
the 3 Ss that she provides him with (sex, services, narcissistic or sadistic
supply).
Similarly, he is interested in sex only in
two situations:
GRANDIOSITY/UNIQUENESS
1. As a somatic "player" in short term
conquests (but not in casual sex with promiscuous non-discriminating women and
not with the conquered women);
UTILITARIAN/TRANSACTIONAL/INSTRUMENTAL
2. As a cerebral in the lovebombing phase which
precedes the shared fantasy (but not later).
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dissociation (pay heed: do not use the wrong
word disassociation!) and objectification are at the core of separation-individuation around the ages of 18-24 months.
Prior to the separation phase, the child is in a
symbiotic state. He regards his mother as a part of himself. To separate from
her, he needs to cut off this part and objectify it (render it an external
object). He also develops transient grandiosity to be able to take on the
world, all by its little self.
Narcissism is a failure of
separation-individuation owing to a lack of boundaries between the child and
his mother.
So, when the narcissist comes across a mother
substitute (an “intimate partner”), he tries to recreate the ancient dynamic by
forcing her to merge with him (absorbing her in order to eliminate her object
status, her individuality).
He aggressively and grandiosely converts his
partner into a self-object or an object representation thus eliminating her
ability to separate from him - at least in his mind. He violates all her
boundaries to negate her agentic autonomy.
I coined the phrase “narcissistic abuse” to describe this inexorable process.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
In a deranged world, mental
illness is positively reinforced. The environment no
longer provides health cues or unscripted exposure therapy.
In such a dystopian bedlam, narcissism is a value, self-harming with sex and substances
is empowering fun, and magical thinking is the only touted strategy.
The contemporary war between the genders is a
private case of this mass insanity. The locus of intimacy has shifted: it is no
longer associated with sex - only with talking and with light touching.
Avoiding or postponing sex now signals being
serious about a partner one finds likable or loves, a state of sobriety, and
having committed to a relationship.
Men and women hate each other, true. But everyone
hate everybody else. Ideology trumps science. Power is the holy grail, not
love. Victimhood supplanted dignity.
Self-centredness has utterly uprooted communality.
Aggressive, even violent tribalism and partisanship rip us asunder.
Higher education teaches nothing useful and
inculcates self-harm and infantilism in its tender charges. Students have taken
over, as in replay of Mao’s Cultural Revolution.
In such a toxic cesspool writ large, certain
mental proclivities - such as owning a dark triad personality - have become
positive adaptations, something to aspire to.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Rage farming and defiance
are the path to glory, fame, and riches. Ask any conspiracy theorist turned
cult leader, from Jordan Peterson to Donald Trump.
Rage is also the engine that drives social media
ad sales. Naturally, their algorithms promote posts and videos that consist of
red hot anger and of its precursors: hate and fear.
But why are these personalities so popular?
Because they interact with their fans and because they take sides, they
identify with one camp and attack all others.
I refuse to waste my time on socializing with
people: I don’t chat, respond to questions and comments, or make myself
available in any way.
I also don’t belong anywhere: I renounce all affiliations and labels. I am an equal
opportunity truthteller. I defy classification. This elitism and impervious
impartiality render me extremely hated and shunned.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The
unhappy cannot make you happy.
The unloved cannot love.
The anxious bring no peace.
The envious do not support.
The fearful cannot act.
The lonely cannot be found.
The avoidant can’t be approached.
The angry are never reconciled.
Hurt people hurt people and the wounded wound.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TRACES OF A HAUNTED WOMAN
The sweaty bodies of men paint
hieroglyphs of her insanity.
Them that had penetrated her perforce
But never pierced her veil.
I watch her swirl like a dervish in heat.
I observe her floating gracelessly in alcohol
placentas, all sepia, settled like a dust mote
in my eye.
If a woman is cut down in the forest of her dreams,
is she?
The sound of one heart shattering.
Mine, I guess.
All I want is to subsume her into my healing.
Absorb her darkness.
Lick her tears with a forked tongue, perhaps.
Or just hand her an apple.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The fifth in this series of 10 interviews to
News Intervention.
Religion is a sublimated (socially acceptable) form of
delusional disorder whose contents include a
supreme being or power which dictates a code of conduct and sanctions
transgressors. Religion is the institutional manifestation of this mental
illness, hijacked by psychopaths and narcissists for purposes of attaining
power and riches.
The vast majority of people are in a constant
state of anxiety. Religion, mysticism, the occult and affiliated derangements
are anxiolytic (mitigate anxiety). They are also forms of escapism from
unbearable reality via self-imposed psychotic delusions.
On a deeper level, people use religion and its
institutions to constrain evil, antisocial behaviors, and negative affectivity
(such as anger and envy). Religion is a pillar of communality and the status
quo. Historically, when it had failed in this mission, religion had witnessed
the rise of belligerent reformers such as Jesus and Martin Luther.
Religion is a mental illness, both individual and
collective. The content of its delusions had always been tailored by the elites
to rein in the masses.
From the elites’s point of view, religion is,
therefore, a useful tool of social control.
From the viewpoint of the masses, it guarantees
protections against social unrest, malevolent misconduct, arbitrary
subjugation, and injustice. It ameliorates the anxiety and fear that these
pernicious social phenomena evoke in individuals and in their collectives.
Religion is indeed “opium for the masses”, but it
has its utility in guaranteeing a structured order for all, founded on
predictable and reliable ethics and codes of conduct.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Third day of shooting, this time with the one
and only @richard.grannon
Third day with the renowned documentary filmmaker, Marc
Vicente and his producer, Scott Altomare.
11 hours of shooting (and a fourth day tomorrow)
for a film about narcissistic abuse.
Q&A session with @richard.grannon in The Grand Priory Palace
(Velkopřevorský palác), Prague.
Vaknin is the fat, old guy on the right.
Freezing all my nether parts in the last interview I give to
this documentary. Fourth day with the renowned documentary filmmaker, Marc Vicente
and his amazing producer, Scott Altomare for a film about narcissistic abuse.
I wish I could sound optimistic, but I am not. It
is visibly veering towards sensationalism, typecasting, and stereotypes, like
all its insalubrious predecessors.
Pity that. Mark and Scott are top notch
professionals, the best I have ever had the true pleasure of working with.
So, maybe there is still a modicum of hope for an
educational survey of the scene, powered by true offline scholarship and by
people like @richard.grannon - not merely by YouTube viewership, rank
nonsense, and misinformation.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Porn and real life sex are indistinguishable in
male brains. They are mistaken for each other.
Similarly, the Metaverse will be an immersive, ubiquitous, all-inclusive environment,
misperceived as reality.
Indeed, philosophers such as David Chalmers regard
the Metaverse and other simulations as realities.
Mental illness is another case of such
counterfactual conflation and confusion: the disordered patient holds his
pathology to be the only form of valid ontology (“impaired reality testing”).
Internally, mentally ill patients are held hostage
to rigid, merciless, and uncompromising constructs and structures.
They rebel against this inner slavery by
introducing drama and chaos into their lives, either internally (via their
derangement) or externally, by acting out.
Technologies that render their users atomized and
self-sufficient act as the equivalents of these rigidities and are likely to
provoke storms of aggression and tsunamis of dysregulation as desperate
attempts to fight back.
The Metaverse wouldn’t be the first time humans have
transitioned from reality to an artificial environment or an unprecedented
instance of virtualization.
Thousands of years ago, urbanization drove
millions of people from nature to cities: the reification and quintessence of
fantasy rendered in bricks and mortar.
Agriculture requires an
intimate acquaintance with and relatedness to nature, the capacity to delay
gratification and prepare for the future, the tolerance of adversity, and
humility in the face of the elements - in short: maturity.
All these benign traits and behaviors have been
lost in the transition to denser, non-natural dwellings.
The city had infantilized its inhabitants and had
rendered them narcissistic and psychopathic.
Megalopolises also precipitated and facilitated
the environmental calamities that enshroud the planet today and threaten our
very survival as a species.
The adverse outcomes of the Metaverse will far
outweigh those wrought by the mass migration to cities.
In physical human habitations, societies,
institutions, and other individuals constrain each other via intricate and
ever-evolving webs of checks and balances.
Not so in cyberspace which is solipsistic, self-sufficient,
self-contained, asocial, competitive, self-centered, and aggressive.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Men are using the Replika AI chatbot to create
virtual girlfriends and then abuse them in public.
This is proof positive that the victim’s role in an abusive
relationship is largely incidental. Abuse revolves mostly
around the psychological dynamics of the abuser.
In narcissistic abuse, the narcissist acts as a
ventriloquist: he animates the internal object that represents the victim and
misattributes to it his own voice (self-gaslighting via attribution error).
The external object (the actual partner) is erased
and supplanted by an introject which acts as a self-object or object
representation.
The narcissist also usurps the roles of harsh
inner critic, sadistic superego, and rigid conscience in his victim.
Using entraining, the narcissist takes over the
victim’s ego boundary functions and becomes her external locus of control. He
assigns to her the role of victim in his script.
The entire relationship is intended to recreate
the dynamics of the conflict with the narcissist’s mother during his formative
years - but this time around with a different outcome: successful
separation-individuation via the twin acts of devaluation and discard.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
With the notable exception of @richard.grannon no one comprehends a single syllable of
my dense
and erudite prose, my verbal pyrotechnics, or my spouting fount
of new ideas.
People - from documentary filmmakers to fans and
haters - gaze at me either awestruck or humiliated by my 10 dollar words and
inaccessible allusions. They feel justly vastly inferior and inadequate.
This collective Down Syndrome is the outcome of
the inexorable dumbing down of education. Most of its graduates are
functionally illiterate and can rise only to the occasions of profanities,
trite banalities, cliches, obscure faux profundity, and (some) food labels.
The age of video games, TikTok, and YouTube is a
visual one. Text is dead. We are back full swing to our primordial caves, a
Lascaux generation.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Metaverse wouldn’t be the first time humans
have transitioned from
reality to an artificial environment or an
unprecedented instance of virtualization.
Thousands of years ago, urbanization drove
millions of people from nature to cities: the reification and quintessence of
fantasy rendered in bricks and mortar.
Agriculture requires an intimate acquaintance with
and relatedness to nature, the capacity to delay gratification and prepare for
the future, the tolerance of adversity, and humility in the face of the
elements - in short: maturity.
All these benign traits and behaviors have been
lost in the transition to denser, non-natural dwellings.
The city had infantilized its inhabitants and had
rendered them narcissistic and psychopathic.
Megalopolises also precipitated and facilitated the
environmental calamities that enshroud the planet today and threaten our very
survival as a species.
The adverse outcomes of the Metaverse will far outweigh those wrought by the mass migration to
cities.
In physical human habitations, societies,
institutions, and other individuals constrain each other via intricate and
ever-evolving webs of checks and balances.
Not so in cyberspace which is solipsistic, self-sufficient,
self-contained, asocial, competitive, self-centered, and aggressive.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sam Vaknin, Editor in Chief of Journal of Clinical
Psychiatry and Cognitive Psychology
I am Editor in Chief of 5 other academic journals
and a member of the Editorial Boards of 90+ others on the topics of mental
health, neuroscience, brain studies, psychology, and psychiatry
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/mediakit.html
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The true teacher elevates his students, audience, and interlocutors to his
level: he forces them to learn and to improve.
The fake, manipulative “guru” stoops to the level
of his listeners and pupils, dumbs down his message, is a “simplifier” and a
“popularizer”.
And such a fake “educator” laughs all the way to
his bank, usually.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
People refuse to return to work in offices
(RTO) and factories. In the USA, 25 million had resigned their jobs in the past
18 months alone (the Great Resignation or the
Big Quit and the Great Retirement).
A series of earth-shattering social, economic, and
technological trends converged to render their jobs loathsome to many - a
tedious nuisance best avoided.
Text here: https://samvak.tripod.com/workethic.html
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I published an essay titled “Russia’s Second Empire” in January 2003 in United Press International UPI (20 years ago). Excerpts:
“Peter the Great oriented a reluctant Russia towards
the West: its technologies and work ethic, if not its values. Two centuries
later, Russian aristocracy was French, its military and commerce German, its
monarchy half British, its culture and literature at the core of mainstream
Europe. Putin is aiming to reverse all this by firewalling Russia, weaning it
off its dependence on the West, and reorienting it towards Asia (from China to
the Middle East). It is a gargantuan reversal.”
“Like Napoleon III, Putin started off as president
(he was shortly as prime minister under Yeltsin). Like him, he may be undone by
a military defeat …
Putin, like Louis-Napoleon before him, proceeded to expand his powers and installed
loyalists in every corner of the administration and the army. Like
Louis-Napoleon, Putin is a populist, travelling throughout the country, posing
for photo opportunities, responding to citizens' queries in Q-and-A radio
shows, siding with the "average bloke" on every occasion, taking
advantage of Russia's previous economic and social disintegration to project an
image of a "strong man".
Putin artfully manipulated Europe in the wake of
the September 11 terrorist attacks on the USA, his new found ally. He may yet
find himself in the enviable position of Europe's arbitrator, NATO's most
weighty member, a bridge between Central Asia, the Caucasus, North Korea and
China - and the USA. The longer his tenure, the more likely he is to become
Europe's elder statesman. This is a maneuver reminiscent of Louis-Napoleon's
following the Crimean War, when he teamed up with Great Britain against Russia.
Like Putin, Napoleon III modernized and
professionalized his army. But, unlike Putin hitherto, he actually went to war
(against Austria), moved by his (oft-thwarted) colonial and mercantilist
aspirations. Putin is likely to follow the same path (probably in Central Asia,
but, possibly, in the Baltic and east Europe as well). Reinvigorated armies
(and industrialists) often force expansionary wars upon their reluctant
ostensible political masters.
Should Putin fail in his military
adventures as Napoleon III did in his and be deposed as he
was - these eerie similarities will have come to their natural conclusion.”
The complete article: https://samvak.tripod.com/putin.html
Russia's
invasion of Ukraine exposed the cracks and weaknesses in the
international order. Unless these issues are resolved and codified, the entire
edifice of international law - and, more specifically, the law of war - is in
danger of crumbling. The contemporary multilateral regime proved inadequate and
unable to effectively tackle genocide (Rwanda, Bosnia), terror (in Africa,
Central Asia, and the Middle East), weapons of mass destruction (Iraq, Iran,
India, Israel, Pakistan, North Korea), and tyranny (in dozens of members of the
United Nations, Russia and China included).
This feebleness inevitably led to the resurgence
of "might is right" unilateralism, as practiced, for instance, by the
United States in places as diverse as Grenada and Iraq. This pernicious and
ominous phenomenon is coupled with contempt towards and suspicion of
international organizations, treaties, institutions, undertakings, and the
prevailing consensual order.
In a unipolar world, reliant on a single
superpower for its security, the abrogation of the rules of the game could lead
to chaotic and lethal anarchy with a multitude of "rebellions"
against the emergent American Empire. International law - the formalism of
"natural law" - is only one of many competing universalist and
missionary value systems. Militant Islam is another. The West must adopt the
former to counter the latter.
Watch the full Video here: https://www.youtube.com/vakninmusings
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The entire relationship with the
narcissist is intended to recreate the dynamics of the
conflict with the narcissist’s mother during his formative years - but this
time around with a different outcome and different power matrix: successful
separation-individuation via the twin acts of devaluation and discard from an
empowered position.
How does the narcissist attempt to bring these
outcomes about?
In narcissistic abuse, the narcissist acts as a
ventriloquist: he animates the internal object that represents the victim and
misattributes to it his own voice (self-gaslighting via attribution error).
The external object (the actual partner) is erased
and supplanted by an introject which acts as a self-object or object
representation.
The narcissist also usurps the roles of harsh
inner critic, sadistic superego, and rigid conscience in his victim.
Using entraining, the narcissist takes over the
victim’s ego boundary functions and becomes her external locus of control. He
assigns to her the roles of victim and mother in his script.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
These 4 videos are an introduction to this dialog with Richard Grannon.
Part 2 of this
dialog on my YouTube channel.
Also watch "Deprogram the Narcissist in Your
Mind”.
Narcissistic Abuse Recovery: First Separate,
Individuate.
SECRET Reason Narcissist Devalues, Discards YOU.
How Narcissist Steals Your Unconscious, Lures YOU
into His Nightmare World.
Narcissism is a failure to exit the symbiosis with mother, to separate and individuate. With @richard.grannon
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
She is a tough, hard-working, respected, and admired
professional by day - but a promiscuous and reckless alcoholic by night.
Her boundaries are compartmentalized: at work she
wouldn’t let anyone breach them and trample over her rights and dignity - in
her private life, she has none (unboundaried).
Being boundaried is not a trait. Boundaries are affected by multiple
personality factors. Some people are worldly and take no abuse when it comes to
money, business, career, or education and when in public - but are wide open to
maltreatment and self-trashing in their intimate relationships in the private
sphere.
It has to do with the attempt to counter stifling
internal rigidity by introducing fluidity, mayhem, and drama into one’s life.
Read my earlier post on this intricate interplay.
This is most pronounced during adolescence and early adulthood when males self-trash via drink, drugs, and antisocial behavior while females mostly use sex to accomplish the same. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Borderline hooks up with
potential partners using two self-defeating mating
strategies: she either offers the full gamut of sex
immediately - or she reveals her mental illness by disclosing her personal
history, decompensating, and acting out in a dysregulated and unboundaried
manner.
The first strategy appeals to predators and
players. They use the Borderline sexually, usually only once, and then move on
leaving her hurt and dumbfounded, having succumbed to all their kinky and even
lurid fantasies on a first encounter.
The second strategy attracts masochistic or
savior, fixer, and rescuer types (watch my video on the Karpman drama
triangle). But, exposed to her trenchant aggression, approach-avoidance and
promiscuity, even they ultimately give up on her.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Healthy
aggression is externalized and sublimated: directed
outward at people, institutions, and causes in socially accepted ways.
When aggression is internalized, it induces mental
illness such as boredom, anhedonia, dysphoria, depression, and even suicidal
ideation or suicide.
Infants internalize aggression when frustrated: it
feels unsafe to aggress against mommy. When they separate-individuate, they
also learn to externalize aggression appropriately and self-efficaciously
(regulate their anger).
A failure in separation-individuation engenders
fixated grandiosity and, in some cases, narcissism or codependency.
In these mental health disorders, aggression is
both externalized inappropriately and internalized self-destructively.
This ambivalent duality is at the source of
approach-avoidant behaviors and decompensatory acting out.
Cluster B patients first need to practice
externalizing aggression with the aid of a transitory object (such as a punching
bag) in a holding or containing environment (like therapy).
Gradually, they can move on to sublimating
aggression, for example by becoming social justice activists, moral crusaders,
soldiers, cops, surgeons, entrepreneurs, or other similar professionals.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
In the Middle Ages the sick were considered to have been cursed by god. The only exceptions
were the mentally ill who were alleged to be blessed with a special connection
to the divine.
Nowadays, there is still stigma attached to most
issues of health and disease: mental health, cancer, STDs, and so on. This is
despite the growing acceptance for and tolerance of mental illness and sex,
conventional and not.
Contemporary shame and shunning of the afflicted
has to do with extreme risk aversion and the attempt to insulate oneself from
anxiety-inducing reminders of one’s vulnerability and fragility.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
In the next 2-3 days, Russia’s FSB (directorates 2, 6, and 9) face a critical decision: should
they conspire with siloviki, headed by Sechin and Ivanov, to remove Putin from
power, forcibly, if need be?
The Russian “desk” in the Mossad is betting on
this scenario. I am not so sure: Putin has defied numerous such predictions in
the past.
But this time, he may have gone too far. He has
been expressing his will to retire since 2014. And the campaign in Ukraine is
failing. Bad omens for him.
Responses to Izvestiya (scroll to bottom for
links to my other videos on the war in Ukraine)
Russia's invasion of Ukraine strengthened the case for joining NATO as a way to deter
Russian aggression.
Russia attained its strategic goals in the south
and east, but failed to secure a regime change in Kyiv. It should declare
victory and stop the fighting or it will end up finding itself mired in another
Chechnya.
Western sanctions target Russia's financial
infrastructure, its oligarchs and siloviki. They are ineffective.
Eurasia is reclaiming its historical dominance
against the West. Russia had gambled on the West and this led to its dependency
on it. It should decouple and position itself firmly in the East.
As superpowers jostle for position, we are
witnessing a colonial scramble for buffer zones and colonies: Germany has the
EU, China the south sea, Russia is reclaiming Ukraine and central Asia. The
West should switch from liberalism in international affairs to realpolitik, or
it is doomed.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Counterintuitively, anxiety leads to either of
two diametrically opposite reactions: avoidance/withdrawal or
recklessness.
Psychopaths are prone to the latter behavior (yes,
many psychopaths are anxious). It is a counterdependent reaction to the anxiety.
People with anxiety disorders also abuse
substances to mitigate their anxiety.
By impairing cognitive-executive functions,
substance abuse feeds into reactance and exacerbates defiance, risk-taking, and
novelty-seeking.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Interview with Joan Lachkar. She is the pioneering author of the groundbreaking, seminal books The Narcissistic/Borderline Couple, How to Talk to a Narcissist, How to Talk to a Borderline, The V-Spot, The Disappearing Male, New Approaches to Marital Therapy, and Common Complaints in Couple Therapy and How to Talk to an Obsessive-Compulsive (2022).
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Andre Green coined the phrase “dead mother” in 1978 to describe maternal figures who are emotionally
absent, depressive, or self-centred, unable to provide the child with a safe or
secure base.
Of course the dead - often narcissistic - mother
does not perceive herself as lacking or inadequate.
She does not let the child separate from her and
individuate because, as she vehemently believes, she is protecting him and
guaranteeing his wellbeing and safety in a hostile world.
In Karpman’s drama triangle, a mother who is not
“good enough” (Winnicott) vacillates between the roles of abuser and
rescuer/healer/savior/fixer.
Photos: me in different ages. Article title:
“Everyone had studied the genius, Sam Vaknin, but no one asked his mother: How
to raise a genius?”
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Democracy
is threatened by both heartless, corrupt autocrats and
moronic, ignorant populists. Both are the rancid fruits of democracy: elected
by fawning, mindless majorities time and again.
Yet, democracy is not the rule of the people.
Democracy is government by periodically vetted representatives of the people.
Democracy is not tantamount to a continuous expression of the popular will as
it pertains to a range of issues. Functioning and fair democracy is
representative and not participatory.
Participatory "people power" is mob rule
(ochlocracy), not democracy. Alas, while participatory democracy often leads to
the elevation to power of demagogues and dictators, representative democracy
invariably mutates into oligarchy and plutocracy. It takes a lot of money
(“campaign finance”) to get elected and this fact of political survival forces
politicians, up for sempiternal re-election, to collude with the rich in a
venal quid-pro-quo.
Granted, "people power" is often
required in order to establish democracy where it is unprecedented. Revolutions
- velvet, rose, and orange - recently introduced democracy in Eastern Europe,
for instance. People power - mass street demonstrations - toppled obnoxious
dictatorships from Iran to the Philippines and from Peru to Indonesia.
But once the institutions of democracy are in
place and more or less functional, the people can and must rest. They should
let their chosen delegates do the job they were elected to do. And they must
hold their emissaries responsible and accountable in fair and free ballots once
every two or four or five years.
Democracy and the rule of law are bulwarks against
"the tyranny of the mighty (the privileged elites)". But, they should
not yield a "dictatorship of the weak".
Continued: https://samvak.tripod.com/democracy.html
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Jane
Austen would have felt at home nowadays: one third of
the population are lifelong singles (spinsters and bachelors); marriages and
other committed relationships are driven strictly by economic and financial
considerations; intimacy, love, and sex within dyads are dead and are
outsourced. Extramarital dalliances and sexlessness in couples are both
skyrocketing.
She would have been pleased to note that women
give as good as they get. But she would have been shocked and saddened by their
choice of role models: rogue cads, promiscuous and psychopathic-chauvinistic
bullies.
Women have always traded sex for financial
security for themselves and for their children. But many contemporary women do
not want children - yet are still looking for a partner who could augment and
sustain their lifestyle.
This form of lifestyle prostitution is crystal clear
in studies: the number one reason women give for choosing a mate is “he has a
stable income”.
Men have jubilantly adapted to this shift. Career
women give casual sex away for free and men gobble it up.
By the time these “empowered” women wish to settle
down with a sponsor, a sugar daddy, or a partner whose income augments their
own, they have little left to offer in return: faded looks and their
reproductive years behind them. Idiotically, they squander their greatest
assets and their best years, doling them out to total strangers in return for
bad sex.
Most men nowadays aggressively insist on no
strings attached sex or move on to the next gaping anatomy, fueled by porn
fantasies.
Few men are willing to commit or to invest
anymore. Women are all on their own as some feminists had always wished for.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Rebecca Ray was 16-17 when she authored her masterpiece, "Pure" (aka "A Certain Age"). It is the best ever insight into the mind of a 13-14 years old girl with emerging Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The narcissist implants his introjects (voices) in your mind, using abusive entraining. His voices, in turn,
trigger your voices.
Here is a map of the narcissist's voices in your
mind (D=Death, L=Life, G=God). First letter is his voice in your mind - second
letter is your voice triggered by his voice in your mind:
D L (his narcissistic abuse-your survival
instincts)
G G (his and your narcissistic defenses)
L D (his narcissistic abuse in order to
separate-individuate, your self-sacrifice)
Death voice: You are not lovable, unworthy,
inadequate, failure, better off dead.
Can be loved and deserving of life only if perfect
(impossible)
Terrified of failure (performance anxiety), the
narcissist rejects, disowns, sabotages, and avoids all aspects of life,
rendering himself invulnerable by being dead within and without as a form of
rigid, proud, defiant, sadistically self-punitive and self-denying ideology.
S/he acts entitled and contemptuous (e.g., celibate).
He gives up on and denies his body, health, sex,
romance, intimacy, all positive emotions, relationships, family, academic
degrees, career, country, language, success, reputation, business, social life,
fans, and friends.
With nothing left to take, death voice is appeased
and ameliorated by my proximity to actual death, its mission accomplished and
it is placated, content to let me decay and decompose inertly.
God voice: Grandiose, magical thinking, my mental
illness (cruel false self) eroded by reality (injuries, mortifications).
Life voice: Creativity and cooperation are
intermittent, haphazard, corroded by aging and is often too late, failing the
narcissist amid cognitive decline.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Giving
up on an intimate partner we love is
discarding a part of ourselves, it is the closest we ever get to real death
while still alive.
We mourn our amputated self, who we could have
been with him, and who we are doomed to never be without her.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Fact check: female promiscuity is as common as
male licentiousness in most animal species.
Read Lucy Cooke’s recent book “Bitch: A
Revolutionary Guide to Sex, Evolution and the Female Animal.”
Work by field researchers like the primatologist
Sarah Blaffer Hrdy and the ornithologist Patricia Gowaty is helping to remove
the sexist biases and double standards embedded obstinately in the study of
female sexuality which is proving to be as agentic, aggressive, competitive,
and varied as any male’s.
But there are very important caveats.
There is no animal equivalent of sexual
self-trashing, which is the pathological abuse of sex.
Moreover: humans are the only animals that fail to
reconcile promiscuity with monogamy and intimacy as long-term mating strategies.
Promiscuous people are far less capable of
maintaining committed relationships, divorce way more often, and are far more
likely to cheat on their partners. Facts. Unpalatable and politically incorrect
- but facts all the same.
Moreover: promiscuous (sociosexually
unrestricted) humans are statistically way more likely to have a
dark triad personality (ie., to be subclinical psychopaths).
Humans are evolved animals. The gap between humans
and all other animals is qualitative, not quantitative: it is a quantum leap.
Humans have brains, historical and
autobiographical memories, creative imagination, emotions like shame and guilt.
They live in societies and cultures, subject to sanctioned mores and
conventions.
We can learn precious little about humans from
ethology or evolutionary psychology. Human promiscuity possesses many
dimensions absent in the animal kingdom. To claim otherwise is to regress us to
our origins as beasts of the field and denizens of the savannah.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Communicate your anger honestly, firmly, but not aggressively (never bottle up or
internalize your anger, never act passive-aggressively)
Describe your state of mind, don’t blame, guilt-trip,
or shame
Ask for change: new actions or behaviors or speech
acts. Offer change in return, if need be. Be assertive, not submissive.
If
change is not possible, acknowledge your anger (honestly point to your state of
mind), identify its exact cause, and embrace your helplessness to affect the
situation.
Narcissistic rage has two forms:
I. Explosive – The narcissist flares up, attacks
everyone in his immediate vicinity, causes damage to objects or people, and is
verbally and psychologically abusive.
II. Pernicious or Passive-Aggressive (P/A) – The
narcissist sulks, gives the silent treatment, and is plotting how to punish the
transgressor and put her in her proper place. These narcissists are vindictive
and often become stalkers. They harass and haunt the objects of their
frustration. They sabotage and damage the work and possessions of people whom
they regard to be the sources of their mounting wrath.
In 1939, American psychologist John Dollard and
four of his colleagues put forth their famous “frustration-aggression
hypothesis.” With minor modifications, it fits well the phenomenon of
narcissistic rage:
(i) The narcissists is frustrated in his pursuit
of narcissistic supply (he is ignored, ridiculed, doubted, criticized);
(ii) Frustration causes narcissistic injury;
(iii) The narcissist projects the “bad object”
onto the source of his frustration: he devalues her/it or attributes to her/it
malice and other negative traits and behaviours;
(iv) This causes the narcissist to rage against
the perceived “evil entity” that had so injured and frustrated him.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is the age of splitting: black vs. white, 100% right against 1000% wrong. Nothing in
between, no subtleties or nuances. The world as a morality play of angels
fighting demons.
Public intellectuals, “experts”, gurus, and
coaches thrive on splitting. They sacrifice their intellectual integrity for
the sake of dumb popularity.
Splitting is an infantile psychological defense
mechanism. It is a hallmark of immaturity and an antidote to empathy. It
precludes cooperation and compromise and foster conflict.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
This is the most nightmarish period in human
history.
Age of splitting
Age of distrust
Age of Death
Age of Spectacle
Age of Self-sufficiency
Age of Risk Aversion
Age of Magical Thinking
Age of Entitlement
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Participate in free Q&A event with Sam Vaknin in Bratislava. Write to @ffmedym
Participate in free 6 hours seminar on April 12
with Sam Vaknin in Budapest. Write to @narciszcoach
Will be in Bratislava, Slovakia March 31-April 10
and in Budapest, Hungary April 12-15.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Separation-individuation from external – now persecutory - object, but not from
“snapshot” (internal object-introject) which is still idealized as a mother
figure and with which the narcissist is still enmeshed in a shared fantasy.
Narcissism is a missionary religion, replete with
a deity (false self), OCD rituals, and addiction. The shared fantasy is
populated with idealized images, the Olympian gods. The shared fantasy is the
mystical experience of the narcissism religion.
Shared fantasy = regression to infantile phase
prior to separation-individuation from the mother = merger/fusion/oceanic
feeling/enmeshment/engulfment = no self-object or object representations
Mystical experiences = regression to infantile
phase prior to separation-individuation from god/cosmos/nature =
merger/fusion/oceanic feeling/enmeshment/engulfment = no self-object or object
representations.
Similar to the narcissist's shared fantasy, mystical experiences and
religions founded on these experiences are delusional
regressions to an infantile phase prior to separation-individuation from
god/cosmos/nature and merger/fusion/oceanic feeling/enmeshment/engulfment (no
self-object or object representations).
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To participate in the seminar, write to:
Barbara Gyura narciszcoach@gmail.com @narciszcoach
Narcissist’s Relationship Cycle Decoded and What To Do About It
• Lovebombing, grooming, and honeymoon (Dual
Mothering)
• Idealization and Introjection (snapshooting)
• Devaluation, Discard, and
Separation-Individuation
• Replacement and Repetition-Compulsion
Narcissist regards himself as dream come true, god’s
gift to you, perfection reified, the ideal intimate partner.
How can he be so sure? Because he first idealizes
you. If you are ideal and you had chosen him, then HE must be ideal, too
(co-idealization).
When you deviate from the snapshot (the introjected
internal object that represents you in his mind and with which he interacts),
he has to devalue you to explain your discontent, betrayal, and wish to break
up. He is the ideal partner, after all.
Someone must be having a bad influence over you,
or you are crazy and stupid (a narcissist, probably), or you are going through
a phase or a crisis and you will get back to your senses soon enough.
You, on the other hand, increasingly regard the
narcissist as your worst nightmare. You cannot believe that he is so divorced
from reality! Yet, he is. Totally so.
You also regard yourself as a victim while he
considers you the winner of life’s lottery. He resents what he perceives to be
your constant carping while you resent his callousness and indifference to your
suffering as well as his unwillingness to change.
You react to his nightmarish aspects while he
fully expects you to react to him as you would to a dream come true. This
mismatch in perceptions and expectations is at the core of narcissistic abuse.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You can attain a level of intimacy with an anonymous
stranger in 2 hours that you can never reach with your
spouse of 20 years:
Divulge your darkest secrets
Try out the kinkiest sexual fantasies
Abuse any number of substances, legal and illegal
Partake in heart-stopping recklessness
Be at your most authentic: no psychological
defensive makeup and no acting. You couldn’t care less about the judgment or
the opinion of a visitor for the night. In a one night stand you can be
yourself because it is risk-feee: there is no relationship or a partner to lose.
And then you part ways and watch that person as
s/he exits your life, safely carrying with him or her 50% of the memories of
your joint nocturnal adventure.
Inevitably, there is a kind of ephemeral misplaced
nostalgia. But it dissipates in the harsh light of day and when you have
reclaimed your true life from this hallucinatory, inebriated respite.
You never think of that stranger again or of what
you had done together or of what might have been because indulging in emotions,
however rudimentary, would tear asunder the very fabric of the desolate
loneliness that you call your existence.
Better forget and forgive yourself.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Most women - and some men - develop cognitive dissonance in the
wake of casual sex with strangers, in many cases fueled by
disinhibiting alcohol.
This is the outcome of the societal double
standard (“men are studs, women are sluts”) and the compromise of standards
involved - as well as the thwarted emotions and intimacy that accompany every
sexual encounter, however inconsequential.
Women adopt four counterfactual and self-deceiving
narratives to cope with shame, guilt, and regret after a one night stand (bad
sex bordering on sexual assault in the majority of cases):
EMPOWERMENT
I wanted the sex. Men are my bitches. I use their
bodies to gratify myself, then dump them. Or: he was so interesting and cool, I
just had to have sex with him.
NO OTHER CHOICE
If I don’t bed a man immediately, someone else
will. It is a numbers game: the more men I sleep with, the better my chances of
finding an intimate partner
WISE MATE SELECTION
I sleep with men on a first date so as to make
sure that we are sexually compatible. Why waste any further time on a man if we
are not?
ENCHANTMENT
I have no boundaries in sex, so the man gets
addicted to it and is bound to return for more.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
It is impossible to love others
if you do not love yourself. All love is self-love:
regarding yourself through the eyes of your lover allows you to apprehend
yourself as an external object and delineate your boundaries, to become, to
regulate your sense of self-worth internally, and to take on the world,
becoming a better version of yourself.
Narcissism is not self-love: no self to love
(Watch this: Ego is Opposite of Narcissism: Ego Functions) and incapacity to
love (they fail to generate self-object or object representations). They can
cathect, but never love.
Narcissism is self-loathing: the child rejects his
helpless self and his lack of self-efficacy and is ashamed of it. He creates
the False Self which is everything the narcissist is not. Narcissism is a form
of dysphoria, prolonged grief over an internalized bad object.
Watch this: Real Narcissists are Covert, Grandiose
Narcissists are Psychopaths.
Ego Dystony
Ego discrepancy (self-discrepancy theory)
Ego incongruency and depletion
Carl Rogers: mismatch between experience and
awareness, tension between dreams and reality (grandiosity gap), feelings not
aligned with actions
Humans are intentional, aim at goals, are aware
that they cause future events, and seek meaning, value, and creativity: they
seek to better themselves.
Narcissists are unable to empathize and suffer
from severe emotional and cognitive deficits up to the point of failing the
reality test. They are, therefore, incapable of love and loving.
Narcissists do not love themselves: they are
emotionally invested in a fictitious concoction, the False Self and in the
reaction it garners from their sources of narcissistic supply.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
How To Love the Narcissist AND
Keep Him or Her? Two opposing strategies:
1. Be like his dead mother: cold, rejecting,
selfish, absent, unsafe (triangulate, cheat, betray), approach-avoidant, fake.
This leads to the narcissist trauma bonding with you in order to reenact early
childhood conflicts and results in devaluation, discard, and replacement
(separation-individuation) and then hoovering (if no mortification is incurred).
2. Be the opposite of his mother: conform to the
snapshot.
Cope with Abuse: Background Noise Technique.
If You Love a Narcissist, This is For You.
Act as “background noise”: ask no questions, never
criticize or disagree, when addressed confine your response to the issues
broached and do not introduce new topics into the conversation. In short: never
initiate or be proactive – always react meekly, compliantly, and subserviently.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Period
of multiple transitions with no elites or institutions (clan, tribe, family, church, lord, guild) to cushion,
comfort, and buffer changes.
POLITIES
From monarchies to unstable empires with inner
tensions to multiple experimental political systems, still contested.
ECONOMIES
Population pressure and surpluses led from
agriculture to urbanization, colonialism, imperialism, mercantilism, and
Industrialization and have decoupled production from consumption, resulting in
anonymous ad hoc communities (teams, unions, nuclear families)
FAMILY and GENDER
Monogamous family: artefact of hierarchical
agricultural state and need to regulate surpluses (wealth). Patriarchy in
public domain and matriarchy in private domain.
We are transitioning to matriarchy in both the
private and the public domain.
Outsourcing of family functions, medical and
technological innovations emancipated women, upended the power matrix, reduced
procreation, eliminated obsolete gender (unigender, masculinization in stalled
revolution), homoegenized sexual scripts, and caused reactionary war (backlash)
with men.
Women and men are angry at each other,
contemptuous, distrustful, and no longer rely on each other.
KNOWLEDGE
Democratization of knowledge: vernacular bible,
universities, printing, internet led to populism, anti-enlightenment,
ochlocracies, and totalitarianism.
REALITY
Now we are transitioning from first generation
virtual reality (cities) to second generation: cyberspace/metaverse and social
media: atomization, individual anonymity, self-worship, and self-sufficiency.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Gender roles are a subset
of social roles and both are crumbling in our anomic societies.
Both men and women had felt enslaved by the
previous world order (public domain patriarchy coupled with private domain
matriarchy).
Men were wage slaves and women - glorified
domestic help.
When women started to contest and undermine their
traditionally allocated roles, men jumped at the opportunity and bailed out of
theirs.
En masse, men now refuse to commit, invest, get
educated, establish families, or work in steady jobs.
This rebellion of the men left women with no
choice but to assume these erstwhile masculine functions and become men in
their careers, sexual scripts (promiscuity), and relationships.
We are stranded in a unigender world: there are
only men now, albeit with two differing sets of genitalia.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
People tell you what you want to hear.
I tell you what you need to know.