Philosophical Fragments 3
By: Dr. Sam Vaknin
Go to Philosophical Fragments 1, 2, and my Blog
II. Living Languages
III. Life’s Lessons
IV. Body Odors
VI. Free Speech in Times of Pandemic
VIII. Luxury Brands
XI. The Body
XII. Wave of Entitlement
XIII. Public Intellectuals
XIV. Three Authors
XVI. Way to Extinction
XVII. The Fairer Sex
XVIII. Narcissism: Antidote to Narcissism
XIX. Giving Up
Malignant Self Love - Buy the Book - Click HERE!!!
Relationships with Abusive Narcissists - Buy the e-Books - Click HERE!!!
READ THIS:
Scroll down to review a complete list of the articles - Click on the blue-coloured text!
Bookmark this Page - and SHARE IT with Others!
Interdisciplinarity - borrowing concepts and tools from one field of
study or practice to enrich another and contribute to it - is either derided or
hyped in academic circles. In my experience, being exposed to a variety of
disciplines is invaluable.
Consider my recent tribulations:
I am in the throes of developing a new approach to advertising, sales, and
marketing, based on Behavioral Economics and Behavioral Finance.
Conventional economics is founded on wildly unrealistic assumptions regarding
human nature and, by extension, the conduct of human institutions.
One of them is that firms seek to maximize profits and productivity. Having
managed and owned many firms and having spent two decades as advisor to firms
on 4 continents, I can attest that this is unmitigated nonsense.
Firms seek to optimize - not maximize - profits, they adopt the path of least
resistance. And as far as productivity: it depends on how fierce the
competition is. Absent competition, there is no incentive to increase it.
I was wracking my brain on how to capture the essence of the real conduct and
choices of the firm. And then it occurred to me: The GOOD ENOUGH firm! It is a
phrase I shamelessly modelled after Winnicott's good enough mother (in his
book, "Playing and Reality"). Firms invariably settle on being good
enough, until they are rattled by an external shock.
So, my access to both domains - economics and psychology - fostered the kind of
synergy that I needed to obtain a breakthrough. It works!
To preserve a language as a LIVING
LANGUAGE, the following conditions
must be met:
1. An academy of language to set standards and preserve linguistic knowledge
2. A corpus of words codified in works of reference such as dictionaries and
thesauri
3. A population which speaks the language and shares the same cultural and
historical space
4. Literature and media which make use of the language as a primary resource
5. Constant innovation and neologization (creation of new words) in slang and
in various disciplines like technology.
I have learned three solid
facts - life-saving lessons - in 25 years of work in the burgeoning field of psychology:
1. Action not only implies and indicates intention - but proves its existence.
Actions are always choices and are the only data accessible to us. States of
mind are self-reported and unreliable to the point of being useless.
Psychodynamics are inferred. But actions are indisputable and the golden
standard: they teach us what people actually meant and planned to do, alone or
with others.
Even when under the influence of massive amounts of alcohol or other
substances, executive functions and decision-making processes are intact.
People make conscious choices when they are inebriated very much as they do
when they are sober.
Moreover: inaction is a form of action. It involves choice and resolve.
Procrastination simply means that the person elects to not act. It demonstrates
reluctance, aversion, or fear. It is a protracted act.
2. The second lesson I have learned is: "If it walks like a duck and
quacks like a duck - better treat it as a duck. Who cares if it really is a
duck?" If someone habitually abuses you, withholds, hurts you, or is being
cruel to you - better assume that he hates your guts. Whether he actually does
loathe you or does not is immaterial: put distance between the two of you.
3. Finally: a bad weather only friend is a bad friend. Someone who craves to
learn every last detail solely about your defeats and failures, depression and
life's ineluctable catastrophes is turned on by your misery. Such a
"buddy" is equally likely to envy your successes and try to stymie
your growth, pull you down, and tear you apart.
Do you stink?
Are your body odors overpowering and nauseating?
1. Ask someone you trust to be truthful if you smell noxious and from which
precincts of your body
2. Inhale the wafting aroma of hot coffee for 3 minutes and then smell all
parts of your body, your clothing, and your shoes.
Coffee resets the smell buds in the nose: it "reboots" the nose.
3. Newborns react strongly to body odors. Because they cannot fully see in the
first few months, they compensate with a much stronger sense of smell. If a
baby does not protest strongly when held, it means the person holding the baby
in her arms is possessed of a good smell.
4. Finally, women find some female body odors offensive even as men find these
smells attractive and arousing. Similarly, women get turned on by male
perspiration and by other scents that men find objectionable.
There is no difference between prostitutes, laborers, and, say,
professors: all three are selling time-limited rights to access portions of
their anatomies (vaginas, muscles, or brains)
The leasing of body parts ("labor") to third parties
("employers") accelerated after the agricultural and industrial
revolutions, both of which engendered great needs for hired hands
Nowadays, the branding, packaging, sale, and
distribution of such corporeal and intellectual rights are vastly different:
technology has elevated personal autonomy and has empowered individual,
self-employed service providers. But the principle is still the same: we all
peddle bits and pieces of our lives and bodies in return for food, shelter, and
entertainment.
Modern Civilization is a Death Cult. Our civilization - West and East - is a Thanatic death cult: in consumerism and materialism, we worship the inanimate and cathect (emotionally invest) in it and we dysempathically objectify people and treat them as dispensable and interchangeable.
VI. Free Speech in Times of Pandemic
Freedoms of speech and press are as curtailed and threatened in the
ostensibly liberal West as they are in the authoritarian East - but in
different ways.
Outright censorship exists even in countries like Israel. My sister acted as
the army's Chief Censor for many years. Some countries firewall and filter the
Web ("sovereign Internets"). But there are other, equally potent
ways, to stifle free expression. There are laws on the books of countries such
as the United Kingdom that prohibit "malicious communication": any
text or visual that "distress" or "offend" someone! Privacy
laws prohibit intrusive prurient snooping but also legitimate investigative
journalism. Whistleblowers pay a dear price if they dare: ask Assange. These
all have chilling effects on the unbridled exchange of information.
But possibly the greatest threat is political correctness: the strictures
against any speech that is sexist, racist, ageist, antisemitic, or targets any
minority group - as well as the suppression of any frank discussion of sexual
practices. A lot of totally legitimate research is outlawed this way.
We are living in an age of total
politics, akin to total war: the
entire population is involved via vast networks of corrupt and venal patronage
Switzerland is the only largely apolitical exception: a prosperous,
well-governed, Athenian haven in a world of sleazy, bigotted, ignorant, parvenu
and fatuous demagogues, more concerned solely with entertaining the brainless
masses and with ruthless self-enrichment and self-preservation
Albert Einstein wrote this
quote. He represented the holistic school in physics. Holism
has been battling reductionism in all
human affairs: are we merely the sum of our parts?
Consider even sex. A partner's bodily organs - genitalia, a mouth - can be
deployed for pleasure as mere masturbatory aides. Or they can stand for the
delectable and irresistible entirety of a loved one. Identical mechanical
experiences gain two radically disparate meanings, depending on whether the
state of mind is reductionist (casual romp with a stranger) or holistic (love
making with a significant other). One can even transition between the two
states with the same person as the relationship deepens.
Or dinner. With a work colleague, the shallow focus would be on a sliver of
life (professional, gossip, or a one night stand). This is reductionism. A
romantic date would involve so much more! Holism in action: deeper resonant
emotions, compounded expectations, values and beliefs, long-term goals. The
entire person, in all his or her dimensions.
Or a conversation. Language or speech can be used to convey little and only
factually - or to touch the soul. Reductionism, holism.
Modern science and medicine are utterly reductionist, concerned with fleeting
moribund leaves in a dense and infinite forest. Missing and ignoring the big
picture in favour of minutiae has been leading our species astray for centuries
now, at least since Descartes.
The absence of polymaths and Renaissance men is a symptom of a malaise of
intellectual sterility. The synergy afforded by true interdisciplinarity had
become a lost art. Aesthetics and fecundity are sacrificed at the altar or
efficacy and recursivity.
High-end, luxury
brands have to adapt and get embedded
in a mix of products and services in this post-apocalyptic world.
Immediately after the lockdown restrictions are lifted, people with means will
spoil themselves and compensate by purchasing expensive brands and services.
But this will be a passing and brief phase.
The economic crisis which is already upon us and the attendant uncertainty are
historically unprecedented. They will force people to either cut back on
non-essential consumption and search for cheaper substitutes. Past experience
teaches us that everyone tend to economize, except the super rich who splurge
with carpe diem abandon.
Businesses of all sorts will have to adapt by offering services either
digitally or at the client's homes ("takeaway"), emphasizing medical
safety and de-emphasizing luxury brands and exorbitantly priced services in
favor of less high-end alternatives.
The key demand will be for EDUCATION, especially delivered online or digitally,
but also in small classes or one on one.
Businesses should make available a MIX of high-end brands, VIP services,
mid-range brands, and generic but good products and services. Service quality
and special, tailored offerings will be far more important than brands.
Even in the devastated business landscape of tomorrow, clients will always
value a personal touch, a good word, a luxury or homely ambience, specialty
services, sales and discounts, comfort and ease of service, and home delivery.
Among other things,
economists study the lifelong decisions of individuals to spend money they
earn, invest it, or save it (delay the gratification of consumption). The
theoretical rational agent spreads his income over the horizon of his life
expectancy, making use of the productive years to both consume wisely and
create a nest egg for him and for his dependants.
In reality, people are all over the place, expending their scarce resources
irrationally, not saving as much as they should (borrowing is a form of
negative savings), and not mindful of the growing structural instability of the
modern workplace and the not so new normal.
One reason for these inexplicable choices is a cognitive dissonance between the
certainty of our demise and our planning for a future of immortality. All of
us, young and old alike - even the retired and the terminally ill - act as
though we are going to live forever even as we realize and accept that death
await us all. We deny our mortality and ephemeral transience. We make children
to extend our useful economic lives and to provide us with a delusion of
continuance beyond the grave.
More here: https://samvak.tripod.com/mortal.html
X. American Power
In his new book,
"Exercise of Power", former Secretary of Defense of the USA and the
youngest chief of the CIA ever, Robert Gates laments the decline in American
power worldwide. He attributes this process to America's over-reliance on
projected and deterrent military might at the expense of all other soft power
options: diplomacy, culture, international development and humanitarian aid,
and other options. Many of these alternatives were literally dismantled even as
military budgets ballooned inexorably and explosively.
But Gates fails to realize that this is merely one aspect of the brutalization
of American policies, institutions, and discourse. Internally, there has been a marked and
revolutionary shift to heavily militarized policing at the expense of social,
educational, welfare, and mental health services. Now, at the behest of ever
more belligerent and confrontational authorities, the army itself is getting
directly involved in domestic politics.
The body is an aging map of bulging scars and a topography of
tactile memories.
Different intimate partners dwelled on different patches, caressed and toyed
with extremities, appendages, and crevices. By touching these spots in one's
body, their presence is evoked, hauntingly luminous and loving.
Ancient wounds, long crusted over, reify adventures not forgotten and battles
never won. An entire biography encased in delicate skin, a piece of history
trapped, the ephemeral fossils of the corporeal.
We carry our bodies like a burden, a vade mecum, a cry. And one day we shed
them and we and everyone encoded in their cells is no more.
Lately, a wave of entitlement is sweeping across the globe: minorities, real and self-styled, are demanding rights and actions consistent with those rights. Entitlement is a diagnostic criterion for Narcissistic Personality Disorder in the DSM.
The problem is that someone's rights are another person's obligations: rights instantly give rise to commensurate duties of others.
Everyone is entitled to negative rights: to NOT be killed, incarcerated for no reason, muzzled, robbed, or maimed, for example.
But no one is entitled to positive rights. No one has the right to housing, food, sex, education, access ramps, moneymaking, healthcare, honest dealings, good governance, retirement benefits, decent habitation, clean air, decent burial, objective news, or anything else whatsoever.
Positive rights are coercive because they appropriate one person's resources - time, money, health - to cater to another person's need. Even in principle, there could never be a rigorous justification to such expropriation and redistribution.
Skin color, year of birth, disability, type of genitalia are all irrelevant in the proper calculus of rights. Only two factors are relevant: one's humanity (the fount of negative rights) and the utilitarian greater good.
Defy the Absurd!
LIFE can LAUGH at us -
But only WE can SMILE back!
Our Public
"Intellectuals": Avarice, Malice, Grandiosity
"The vibrant world of private empathy has been replaced by faceless state
largesse. Pity, mercy, the elation of giving? They're all tax deductible. And
generally speaking, it is a sorry sight. It's the demise of empathy.
We have been warning against this for ages and no one would listen. And no one
would listen because the ethos of money, the ethos of power, the ethos of
manipulating other people to obtain desirable goals and preferable outcomes -
it's taken over.
Even public intellectuals who tell you how to live your lives, how to become better people -
they're not telling you how to become BETTER people. They're teaching you how
to become more EFFICIENT people - very often at the expense of others.
I'm sorry. I can't think of a single public intellectual who is not
narcissistic, psychopathic, self-centered, egotistical, labile, dysregulated,
sadistic to some extent...and all of them are telling you - all of them are
teaching you - NOT how to develop empathy, compassion, and care, and love
towards your fellow beings, but how to make maximal use of your natural
endowments and to fake and to lie and to pretend - so as to obtain and to
extricate whatever you can from others.
In other words, the view of public intellectuals today is that the world is a
win-lose situation. And, in this sense, I'm terribly sorry to say that I can't
see any difference in principle between Donald Trump's jungle, Darwinian view
of the world and any public intellectual I know. They're all saying the same.
But some of them are saying it in a highfalutin way - and some of them in a pub
with a pint kind of way. But they are all saying the same: It's eat or be
eaten, kill or be killed, manipulate or be manipulated. Don't be the sucker!
Get ahead! Make the most!
And the hell with others."
Taken from https://youtu.be/nIefBSuvAGw
XIV. Three authors on empathy, love, and fear
"The simple fact is that when faced with a living, breathing opponent instead of a target, a significant majority of the soldiers revert to a posturing mode in which they fire over their enemy's heads."
On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman
"Agape is more than romantic love, agape is more than friendship. Agape is understanding, creative, redemptive, good will to all men. It is an overflowing love which seeks nothing in return. Theo¬logians would say that it is the love of God operating in the human heart. So that when one rises to love on this level, he loves men not be¬cause he likes them, not because their ways appeal to him, but he loves every man because God loves him. And he rises to the point of loving the person who does an evil deed while hating the deed that the person does. I think this is what Jesus meant when he said 'love your enemies.'"
A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr.
"The short answer to why Americans harbor so many misbegotten fears is that immense power and money await those who tap into our moral insecurities and supply us with symbolic substitutes."
The Culture of Fear by Barry Glassner
According to Harvard Business School and autobiographical testimonials by the rich and mighty, successful people have these four elements in common:
1. Luck: being in the right place, at the right time, with the right people. By far the most important factor and determinant of making it.
2. The ability to identify opportunities, almost instinctually and intuitively: what do people want but lack, need but miss, offer but unable to sell, manifest, or produce. Most importantly: to identify correctly what lurks beyond people's awareness and consciousness and to render such content overt and much sought after.
3. The impulsive proclivity to take immediate action to capitalize on opportunities, almost recklessly, careful analysis and risks be damned.
4. Self-love: to persevere in the pursuit of one's best self-interests in the face of hurdles and haters and critics and doubters. To not engage in self-defeating, self-destructive, or self-trashing behaviors.
Three Risks: On the Way to Extinction
Three witches of Macbeth push us inexorably to
extinction:
The pursuit of meaning
The addiction to hope
The aversion to risk
Will lead our species to extinction
XVII. The Fairer Sex
Women have been called
"The Fairer Sex" for good reason: their beauty inspired and motivated, soothed and aroused, and made
the world both a more bearable and hopeful place.
By preserving this pulchritude and enhancing it, a woman cherishes her feminine
essence and buttresses her wellbeing: the external and the internal are
inextricably intertwined in our gender.
We should all - men and women - seek to maintain and improve this temple, the
body: it is a marvel of creation, a sacred deposit, and a message we convey to
others.
In beauty salons and clinics throughout the world, day in and day out, workers
are dedicated to this mission of feminine aesthetics and resulting happiness.
Using the latest technologies, in depth education and training, as well as leading industry brands, the best among these establishments offer a complete and holistic solution to all your needs in this sphere.
XVIII. Subscribe to my new YouTube channel: Nothingness: Antidote to Narcissism
Nothingness
is not about being a nobody and doing nothing.
It is about choosing to be human, not a lobster.
It is about putting firm boundaries between you
and the world.
It is about choosing happiness - not dominance.
It is accomplishing from within, not from without.
It is about not letting others regulate your
emotions, moods, and thinking.
It is about being an authentic YOU.
To
see how far we have deteriorated as a civilization, how atomized and alienated
we had become, how extinct solidarity and empathy are, here is an excerpt from Daniel Defoe’s
“Journal of the Plague Year” (a semi-autobiographical narrative of the bubonic
plague in 17th century London):
“A near view of death would soon reconcile men
of good principles one to another and that (it) is chiefly to our easy
situation in life and our putting these things far from us that our breaches
are fomented, ill blood continued ... Another plague year would reconcile all
these differences, a close conversing with Death or with diseases that threaten
Death, would scum off the gall from our tempers, remove the animosities among
us and bring us to see with differing eyes”.
We
used to have an intimate relationship with death, with our inevitable departure
from the world. Demise was as much a part of life as birth: we did not exist
before we were born and, at some point, we will cease to exist again.
No one wanted to die prematurely - but no one
made life itself an extended exercise in evading the inevitable. We ventured
gently into the night, grateful for having had the chance and gift of spending
some time in this incomparable theme part called “reality”.
The great 17th century essayist, Michel de
Montaigne, wrote:
“Let us rid death of its strangeness, come to
know it, get used to it. Let us have nothing on our minds as often as death. At
every moment let us picture it in our imagination in all its aspects ... It is
uncertain where death awaits us - let us await it everywhere. Premeditation of
death is premeditation of freedom ... He who has learned how to die has
unlearned how to be a slave. Knowing how to die frees us from all subjection
and constraint.”
Divorce
is a good exit strategy out of an abusive relationship.
But the problem is that people use it as a first
- not last - resort. Whenever things get even trivially tough - they bail out
rather than try harder.
Nowadays, people give up owing to DIFFICULTIES -
not to ABUSE. They MISLABEL difficulties as “abuse” in order to justify their
lack of perseverance.
Our civilization relies on disposable and
replaceable products - and we treat each other the same way.
The modern concept of a romantic dyad based on
infatuation causes people to renounce reality in favor of fantasy and so they
idealize their partners. This inevitably leads to disillusionment and breakup.
The misguided concept of a love-based marriage
(romantic love) changed the way we select mates.
It is a modern phenomenon. Previous generations
were transactional and saw each other in a realistic light. The mass media -
cinema and romantic literature, especially - taught us to idealize our intimate
partners in any and all ways.
Many studies have shown that people in marriages
that were arranged or subject to matchmaking grew to love and respect each
other. Basing mate selection mostly on lustful sex and on attraction got
humanity into the relationship mess we have now.
Intimate
relationships entail the experiencing, triggering, and display of one's
vulnerabilities. Many find this integral and critical component of intimacy
frightening or distasteful.
Being vulnerable is childlike and, therefore,
could be a wonderful feeling: excitement and relief in equal measures. To cast
aside all masks is to liberating. To finally be 100% you is exhilarating. To be
accepted as you truly are is to be loved.
The disclosure of one's "weaknesses",
fault lines, and deficiencies gives rise to anxiety only when you don't trust
the other party, when you are worried that he might disparage the newly gained
information, reject you, or, much worse, leverage your openness, wounds, and
needs to his advantage.
Compensatory personal boundaries are rigid,
hypervigilant, aggressive (often defiant), and excessive (disproportional).
They are intended to compensate for the lack of enforced boundaries in any one
or more other areas of life.
Thus, if an individual has no boundaries in his
private life, acts as a people pleasing doormat, and is subject to all manner
of disrespectful abuse by his "nearest" and "dearest" - he
is likely to be a tyrant in the workplace, keen to spot transgressions and
slights where there are none, acting entitled and temperamental, and insisting
on perfection or unthinking obeisance to his every whim.
This implies the existence of a "law of
conservation of personal boundaries". One's very identity depends on such
fortified demarcations in at least one realm of one's being, functional
existence, and day to day operations.
There
are three toxic threats to one’s individual freedoms and authentic being: hope, love, and success.
Hope is a counterfactual and delusional reaction
to despair and meaninglessness. It fosters expectations that are invariably
thwarted. Its companions and successors are depression, frustration, and
aggression. Nothing is more pernicious and insidious than hope.
Love is the pathological attempt to counter
existential and profound loneliness via an idealized, largely narcissistic
narrative projected onto one’s partner. It invariably ends in heartbreak and
devastation because it is inherently contrived and because it involves numerous
practices which runs counter to the pursuit of liberty and happiness.
Success is society’s way of harnessing
individual energies and gifts at the service of the collective and its elites.
It is slavery in all but name.
The rational, sane person avoids this venomous,
identity-eradicating trio. He lives free in the fullest sense of the word: free
of the future and its intimations (hope), free of all others (love), and free
of any organizing principles (success).
Whenever this Nietzschean Superman is threatened
by hope, love, or success - he rebels and recoils and is gone, having left
everything and everyone behind as so many discarded shackles.
Copyright Notice
This material
is copyrighted. Free, unrestricted use is allowed on a non commercial basis.
The author's name and a link to this Website must be incorporated in any
reproduction of the material for any use and by any means.
Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited
World in Conflict and Transition
Internet: A Medium or a Message?
Write to me: palma@unet.com.mk